Relative Rain
If someone goes from his car to his front door in a rainstorm, will
he get more wet, less wet, or equally wet if he runs (rather than
walks)? This is a very commonly asked question. To develop a
quantitative answer, let's first consider a spherical man, and assume
he moves to his car in a straight horizontal path with velocity u.
The raindrops are falling at an angle such that its velocity is v_z
in the downward direction, v_x in the horizontal direction (straight
into the man's face), and v_y in the sideways horizontal direction
(the man's left to right). The intensity of the rain is such that
each cubic foot of air contains G grams of water.
Relative to the rain's frame of reference the raindrops are stationary
and the man and his car both have an upward velocity v_z and a sideways
velocity (right to left) of v_y. In addition, the man has a forward
horizontal velocity of u + v_x.
Clearly the amount of rain encountered by the man is equal to G times
the volume of space he sweeps out as he moves relative to this stationary
mist of raindrops. Since he is spherical with radius R, this swept
volume is essentially equal to pi*R^2*L, where L is the distance
travelled (relative to the rain's frame of reference).
If D is the horizontal distance to the car, and the man moves straight
to his car with velocity u, the time it takes him is D/u. His total
velocity relative to the falling rain is
________________________________
V_t = / (u + v_x)^2 + (v_y)^2 + (v_x)^2 (1)
so the distance he moves relative to the rain is (D/u)*V_t. Therefore,
the amount of rain he encounters in the general case for arbitrary
direction of rainfall is
_____________________________________
| / v_x\2 /v_y\2 /v_z\2
W = G*D*pi*R^2 | ( 1 + --- ) + ( --- ) + ( --- ) (2)
\| \ u / \ u / \ u /
We can easily incorporate other assumptions, such as the man having
some non-spherical shape. It's just a matter of geometry to compute
how much volume he sweeps out relative to the rain's frame of
reference.
Notice that if v_x = v_y = 0 then the rain is falling vertically with
a total velocity v = v_z. In this case equation (2) reduces to
____________
| / v \2
W = G*D*pi*R^2 | 1 + ( --- ) (3)
\| \ u /
which shows that the key parameter is the ratio of the rain's vertical
speed to the man's horizontal speed. Of course, if v was zero (which
would mean the rain was motionless relative to the ground), then L
would always equal D, regardless of how fast the man runs. On the other
hand, for any v greater than zero, the amount of rain he encounters will
go down as his horizontal velocity u increases.
Incidentally, suppose we're waiting for the person in his car, and we
intend to figure out how fast he ran based on how soggy he is when he
reaches the car. We know the distance from the building to the car is D,
and we assume the time he spends in the rain will be proportional to his
wettness when he arrives. Thus we have W = cT, where T is his (presumed)
travel time, w is his accumulated wettness upon arrival, and c is a
constant. Therefore, we perceive his velocity to be
v = Dc/W (4)
If the rain is falling vertically with a constant velocity C, then for
an appropriate choice of units we have
_____________
| / C \2
W = | 1 + ( --- ) (5)
\| \ V /
where V is the person's true speed (with time measured according to
his wrist-watch, rather than according to his wettness). Substituting
this into equation (4) gives the relation between the man's "proper
velocity" and his "wettness velocity"
_______________
v/c | / v \2
----- = | 1 - ( --- ) (6)
V/C \| \ c /
This shows that, although the man can reduce his travel time to an
arbitrarily short duration (according to his wrist-watch), we will
never perceive him to have moved with a velocity greater than c.
Needless to say, equation (6) is the Lorentz transformation factor that
plays a central role in the theory of special relativity, raising the
question: Was Einstein all wet?
Return to MathPages Main Menu